Real-World Evidence Collaborative
A large amount of patient information is captured at the point-of-care or at the patient-level, information that has been described as real-world data (RWD). Health care stakeholders are enthusiastic to explore whether RWD sources and the evidence it can produced (real-world evidence or RWE) can inform and/or hasten medical product development and labeling. Importantly, RWE can inform us about patient and provider choices as well as patient outcomes to help us understand whether medical products are performing as intended in routine care. Ultimately, RWE may drive learning health systems that can benefit patients with greater precision, equity, and impact.
The Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy engages stakeholders through the RWE Collaborative to guide high-priority efforts aimed at improving the development and use of RWE. The RWE Collaborative’s work is intended to drive progress in RWE policy and help inform regulatory agencies, including the FDA, and other key stakeholders with a vested interest in informing the present and future of RWE policy. Using RWD and RWE can improve patient treatment options and outcomes more broadly, and the RWE Collaborative strives to be at the forefront. Guided by an Advisory Group of leaders representing medical product developers, payers, research groups, providers, patient networks, and regulators, the RWE Collaborative is engaged in the following 2023 priorities:
Regulatory Acceptability of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence…New methods of collecting data and evaluating evidence necessitates new regulatory policies and requirements. This workstream looks at where regulatory policy is and whether it needs to go to make RWD and RWE work for all stakeholders.
Regulatory Acceptability of Patient Generated Health Data…Generating high-quality evidence from patient-generated health data is one of the most promising aspects of the RWE ecosystem. Working within the Regulator Acceptability workstream’s umbrella, this project focuses on specific sources of RWD, e.g., wearable sensor data and genomics.
Leveraging Causal Inference for Real-World Evidence…The noise often associated with RWD studies can present challenges when attempting to draw conclusions. Assessing current study designs and statistical methods will help us better understand challenges, limitations, opportunities, and best practices for determining causal inference with RWE.
The Role of Real-World Evidence in Accelerated Approvals and Coverage with Evidence Development…Stakeholders are seeking to align on definitions, standards, and the appropriate role of RWE in accelerated approvals and coverage with evidence development. This workstream explores how RWD/RWE can be used to address both regulatory and payer needs for post-market evidence.
The Real-World Evidence Collaborative is led by Research Director, Rachele Hendricks-Sturrup, DHSc, MSc, MA. To learn more about the group's efforts, please contact her at rachele.hendricks.sturrup@duke.edu
Our Team Members
Duke-Margolis has a robust team dedicated to advancing the RWE Collaborative's goals. Team members are based both in our Washington, DC office as well as in Durham, North Carolina.

Matt D'Ambrosio
Policy Research Assistant

Nora Emmott, MPH
Senior Policy Analyst

Rachele Hendricks-Sturrup, DHSc, MSc, MA
Research Director
Senior Team Member

Trevan Locke, PhD
Assistant Research Director

Maryam Nafie
Policy Research Assistant

Sandra Yankah, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Researcher

A Framework for Regulatory Use of Real-World Evidence
In our first white paper, we define real-world data and real-world evidence and provide context to its role in regulatory decision-making. Consider this a foundation upon which subsequent white papers are built.
Published on September 13, 2017

Characterizing RWD Quality and Relevancy for Regulatory Purposes
Not all RWD is created equal. Regulators need access to ample, well-sourced, fit-for-purpose data, and the data quality paper explains what that means.
Published on October 1, 2018

Determining Real-World Data’s Fitness for Use and the Role of Reliability
By focusing on electronic health records and patient generated health data, the data reliability paper describes a framework for how researchers and reviewers can systematically evaluate whether RWD are fit for use in regulatory decision-making.
Published on September 26, 2019

Understanding the Need for Non-Interventional Studies Using Secondary Data to Generate Real-World Evidence for Regulatory Decision Making, and Demonstrating Their Credibility
Non-interventional studies using secondary data can better reflect broader patient populations, care
settings, and drug uses found in routine clinical practice. However, questions remain as to when these types of studies are applicable. This paper about credibility and observational methods explores several of those questions.
Published on November 25, 2019

Adding Real-World Evidence to a Totality of Evidence Approach for Evaluating Marketed Product Effectiveness
In the totality of evidence paper, we explore the feasibility of overcoming the challenges faced by conducting interventional studies in the real world. How do we address ethical, operational resource barriers? What must be considered when demonstrating the credibility of a non-interventional study using secondary data?
Published on December 19, 2019

Point-of-Care Clinical Trials: Integrating Research and Care Delivery
In our Point-of-Care (POC) paper, we set a baseline for what defines and constitutes a point-of-care trial and explore the current impediments to implementing these burgeoning research methods.
Published on May 11, 2022

Aligning Shared Evidentiary Needs Among Payers and Regulators for a Real-World Data Ecosystem
The Shared Evidentiary Opportunities (SEO) paper uses disease use cases to explore building a robust real-world data ecosystem. This white paper pools the expertise of both the RWE Collaborative and the Center's Value for Medical Products Consortium.
Published on July 20, 2022
Our work
-
Brief: FDA User Fee Reauthorization and the Value of Real-World Evidence
-
Brief: Cures 2.0: Building a Modern Health Data Infrastructure
-
Event: The State of Real-World Evidence Policy
-
Comment Letters
-
Recent Workstreams
-
White Paper Citations Tracker
Advisory Group
Marc Berger Independent Consultant |
Andenet Emiru Director, External Projects & Partnerships; University of California |
Eleanor Perfetto Professor, Pharmaceutical Health Services Research; University of Maryland |
Elise Berliner Global Senior Principal of RWE Strategy; Cerner Enviza |
John Graham Senior VP, Value Evidence and Outcomes; GlaxoSmithKline |
Richard Platt Executive Director; Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute | Chair, Department of Population Medicine; Harvard Medical School |
Barbara Bierer Professor of Medicine; Harvard University |
Matthew Harker Senior Director, Key Account Strategic Solutions; Evidation |
Jeremy Rassen Co-Founder, President, Board Director; Aetion |
Mac Bonafede VP, Real-World Evidence; Veradigm |
Joe Henk Vice President, Clinical Program Evaluation; UnitedHealthCare |
Stephanie Reisinger SVP and GM, Real-World Evidence; Flatiron |
Brian Bradbury VP, Center for Observational Research; Amgen |
Ceri Hirst Real-World Evidence Director; Bayer |
Khaled Sarsour VP, Data Science and Digital Health, Real-World Evidence and Advanced Analytics; Janssen |
Jeffrey Brown Chief Science Officer; TriNetX |
Stacy Holdsworth Senior Advisor; Eli Lilly |
Debra Schaumberg VP and Global Head, Strategic Development Consulting; Evidera, part of PPD clinical research business, Thermo Fisher Scientific |
Adrian Cassidy Global Head of RWE for Oncology; Novartis |
Ryan Kilpatrick VP and Head, Global Epidemiology; Abbvie |
Thomas Seck Head of Global Regulatory Affairs; Boehringer-Ingelheim |
Stella Chang SVP, Client Engagement and Partnerships; OMNY Health |
Lisa Lavange Professor and Chair, Department of Biostatistics; University of North Carolina |
Lauren Silvis Senior Vice President; Tempus |
William Crown Distinguished Research Scientist; Brandeis University |
Grazyna Lieberman Regulatory Policy and Strategy Consultant |
Michael Taylor Global Head of Real-World Data; Genentech |
Mark Cziraky VP, Scientific Affairs; Healthcore |
Erlyn Macarayan VP, Data Science; PatientsLikeMe |
David Thompson Chief Executive Officer; OPEN Health |
Riad Dirani VP, Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research; Teva Pharmaceuticals |
Christina Mack Chief Science Officer; IQVIA | Advisor and Representative; ISPE |
Alex Vance Senior VP, Clinical Data Strategy and Operations; Holmusk |
Nancy Dreyer Sole Proprietor; Dreyer Strategies | CSO Emerita; IQVIA | Adjunct Professor; UNC |
Megan O'Brien Associate Vice President; Merck |
Richard Willke Chief Science Officer; ISPOR |
Omar Escontrias VP, Research, Education, and Programs; National Health Council |
Sally Okun Executive Director; Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative |
Bob Zambon VP, Transformational Design, Solution Architecture and Strategic Partnerships; Syneos Health |
Observers
Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay, Principal Deputy Center Director, CDER, U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Carolyn Shore, Senior Program Officer, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
- Please note that the above list is current as of April 2023 -
Funding
This project is made possible through the generosity of the Margolis Family Foundation, which provides core resources for the Center, as well as a combination of financial and in-kind contributions from collaborative members including AbbVie; Amgen; Bayer; Boehringer Ingelheim; Eli Lilly and Company; Genentech, a member of the Roche Group; GlaxoSmithKline; Janssen; Merck and Company; Novartis; Pfizer; and Teva Pharmaceuticals.
Participation of private or non-profit organizations in Center activities does not imply an endorsement by Duke University or associated entities. As part of Duke University, Duke-Margolis honors the tradition of academic independence on the part of its faculty and scholars. Neither Duke nor the Margolis Center take partisan positions, but the individual members are free to speak their minds and express their opinions regarding important issues. Duke Margolis adheres to all institutional policies on research independence and conflict of interest.