Real-World Evidence Collaborative

Real-World Evidence Collaborative


A large amount of patient information is captured at the point-of-care or at the patient-level, information that has been described as real-world data (RWD). Health care stakeholders are enthusiastic to explore whether RWD sources and the evidence it can produced (real-world evidence or RWE) can inform and/or hasten medical product development and labeling. Importantly, RWE can inform us about patient and provider choices as well as patient outcomes to help us understand whether medical products are performing as intended in routine care. Ultimately, RWE may drive learning health systems that can benefit patients with greater precision, equity, and impact.

The Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy engages stakeholders through the RWE Collaborative to guide high-priority efforts aimed at improving the development and use of RWE. The RWE Collaborative’s work is intended to drive progress in RWE policy and help inform regulatory agencies, including the FDA, and other key stakeholders with a vested interest in informing the present and future of RWE policy. Using RWD and RWE can improve patient treatment options and outcomes more broadly, and the RWE Collaborative strives to be at the forefront. Guided by an Advisory Group of leaders representing medical product developers, payers, research groups, providers, patient networks, and regulators, the RWE Collaborative is engaged in the following 2023 priorities:

Regulatory Acceptability of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence…New methods of collecting data and evaluating evidence necessitates new regulatory policies and requirements. This workstream looks at where regulatory policy is and whether it needs to go to make RWD and RWE work for all stakeholders.

Regulatory Acceptability of Patient Generated Health Data…Generating high-quality evidence from patient-generated health data is one of the most promising aspects of the RWE ecosystem. Working within the Regulator Acceptability workstream’s umbrella, this project focuses on specific sources of RWD, e.g., wearable sensor data and genomics.

Leveraging Causal Inference for Real-World Evidence…The noise often associated with RWD studies can present challenges when attempting to draw conclusions. Assessing current study designs and statistical methods will help us better understand challenges, limitations, opportunities, and best practices for determining causal inference with RWE.

The Role of Real-World Evidence in Accelerated Approvals and Coverage with Evidence Development…Stakeholders are seeking to align on definitions, standards, and the appropriate role of RWE in accelerated approvals and coverage with evidence development. This workstream explores how RWD/RWE can be used to address both regulatory and payer needs for post-market evidence.

 

Rachele Hendricks Sturrup
 
 
The Real-World Evidence Collaborative is led by Research Director, Rachele Hendricks-Sturrup, DHSc, MSc, MA. To learn more about the group's efforts, please contact her at rachele.hendricks.sturrup@duke.edu

 

Our Team Members

Duke-Margolis has a robust team dedicated to advancing the RWE Collaborative's goals. Team members are based both in our Washington, DC office as well as in Durham, North Carolina.

matt d'ambrosio headshot

Matt D'Ambrosio

Policy Research Assistant

Nora Emmott Headshot

Nora Emmott, MPH

Senior Policy Analyst

Dr. Rachele Hendricks-Sturrup image

Rachele Hendricks-Sturrup, DHSc, MSc, MA

Research Director
Senior Team Member

Trevan Locke Headshot

Trevan Locke, PhD

Assistant Research Director

Maryam Nafie Headshot

Maryam Nafie

Policy Research Assistant

Sandra Yankah headshot

Sandra Yankah, Ph.D.

Postdoctoral Researcher

A Framework for Regulatory Use of Real-World Evidence

A Framework for Regulatory Use of Real-World Evidence

In our first white paper, we define real-world data and real-world evidence and provide context to its role in regulatory decision-making. Consider this a foundation upon which subsequent white papers are built.

Published on September 13, 2017

Read More
Characterizing RWD Quality and Relevancy for Regulatory Purposes

Characterizing RWD Quality and Relevancy for Regulatory Purposes

Not all RWD is created equal. Regulators need access to ample, well-sourced, fit-for-purpose data, and the data quality paper explains what that means.

Published on October 1, 2018

Read More
Determining Real-World Data’s Fitness for Use and the Role of Reliability

Determining Real-World Data’s Fitness for Use and the Role of Reliability

By focusing on electronic health records and patient generated health data, the data reliability paper describes a framework for how researchers and reviewers can systematically evaluate whether RWD are fit for use in regulatory decision-making.

Published on September 26, 2019

Read More
Understanding the Need for Non-Interventional Studies Using Secondary Data to Generate Real-World Evidence for Regulatory Decision Making, and Demonstrating Their Credibility

Understanding the Need for Non-Interventional Studies Using Secondary Data to Generate Real-World Evidence for Regulatory Decision Making, and Demonstrating Their Credibility

Non-interventional studies using secondary data can better reflect broader patient populations, care
settings, and drug uses found in routine clinical practice. However, questions remain as to when these types of studies are applicable. This paper about credibility and observational methods explores several of those questions.

Published on November 25, 2019

Read More
Adding Real-World Evidence to a Totality of Evidence Approach for Evaluating Marketed Product Effectiveness

Adding Real-World Evidence to a Totality of Evidence Approach for Evaluating Marketed Product Effectiveness

In the totality of evidence paper, we explore the feasibility of overcoming the challenges faced by conducting interventional studies in the real world. How do we address ethical, operational resource barriers? What must be considered when demonstrating the credibility of a non-interventional study using secondary data?

Published on December 19, 2019

Read More
A Roadmap for Developing Study Endpoints in Real-World Settings

A Roadmap for Developing Study Endpoints in Real-World Settings

Here, we outline a roadmap for developing, enhancing, and utilizing RWE endpoints. Duke-Margolis hosted a webinar to mark the release of the RWE endpoints paper.

Published on August 28, 2020

Read More
Point-of-Care Clinical Trials: Integrating Research and Care Delivery

Point-of-Care Clinical Trials: Integrating Research and Care Delivery

In our Point-of-Care (POC) paper, we set a baseline for what defines and constitutes a point-of-care trial and explore the current impediments to implementing these burgeoning research methods.

 

Published on May 11, 2022

Read More
Aligning Shared Evidentiary Needs Among Payers and Regulators for a Real-World Data Ecosystem

Aligning Shared Evidentiary Needs Among Payers and Regulators for a Real-World Data Ecosystem

The Shared Evidentiary Opportunities (SEO) paper uses disease use cases to explore building a robust real-world data ecosystem. This white paper pools the expertise of both the RWE Collaborative and the Center's Value for Medical Products Consortium.

 

Published on July 20, 2022

Read More

Our work


Advisory Group

 

Marc Berger
Independent Consultant
Andenet Emiru
Director, External Projects & Partnerships; University of California
Eleanor Perfetto
Professor, Pharmaceutical Health Services Research; University of Maryland
Elise Berliner
Global Senior Principal of RWE Strategy; Cerner Enviza
John Graham
Senior VP, Value Evidence and Outcomes; GlaxoSmithKline
Richard Platt
Executive Director; Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute | Chair, Department of Population Medicine; Harvard Medical School
Barbara Bierer
Professor of Medicine; Harvard University
Matthew Harker
Senior Director, Key Account Strategic Solutions; Evidation
Jeremy Rassen
Co-Founder, President, Board Director; Aetion
Mac Bonafede
VP, Real-World Evidence; Veradigm
Joe Henk
Vice President, Clinical Program Evaluation; UnitedHealthCare
Stephanie Reisinger
SVP and GM, Real-World Evidence; Flatiron
Brian Bradbury
VP, Center for Observational Research; Amgen
Ceri Hirst
Real-World Evidence Director; Bayer
Khaled Sarsour
VP, Data Science and Digital Health, Real-World Evidence and Advanced Analytics; Janssen
Jeffrey Brown
Chief Science Officer; TriNetX
Stacy Holdsworth
Senior Advisor; Eli Lilly
Debra Schaumberg
VP and Global Head, Strategic Development Consulting; Evidera, part of PPD clinical research business, Thermo Fisher Scientific
Adrian Cassidy
Global Head of RWE for Oncology; Novartis
Ryan Kilpatrick
VP and Head, Global Epidemiology; Abbvie
Thomas Seck
Head of Global Regulatory Affairs; Boehringer-Ingelheim
Stella Chang
SVP, Client Engagement and Partnerships; OMNY Health
Lisa Lavange
Professor and Chair, Department of Biostatistics; University of North Carolina
Lauren Silvis
Senior Vice President; Tempus
William Crown
Distinguished Research Scientist; Brandeis University
Grazyna Lieberman
Regulatory Policy and Strategy Consultant
Michael Taylor
Global Head of Real-World Data; Genentech
Mark Cziraky
VP, Scientific Affairs; Healthcore
Erlyn Macarayan
VP, Data Science; PatientsLikeMe
David Thompson
Chief Executive Officer; OPEN Health
Riad Dirani
VP, Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research; Teva Pharmaceuticals
Christina Mack
Chief Science Officer; IQVIA | Advisor and Representative; ISPE
Alex Vance
Senior VP, Clinical Data Strategy and Operations; Holmusk
Nancy Dreyer
Sole Proprietor; Dreyer Strategies | CSO Emerita; IQVIA | Adjunct Professor; UNC
Megan O'Brien
Associate Vice President; Merck
Richard Willke
Chief Science Officer; ISPOR
Omar Escontrias
VP, Research, Education, and Programs; National Health Council
Sally Okun
Executive Director; Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative
Bob Zambon
VP, Transformational Design, Solution Architecture and Strategic Partnerships; Syneos Health

 

Observers

Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay, Principal Deputy Center Director, CDER, U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Carolyn Shore, Senior Program Officer, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

 

- Please note that the above list is current as of April 2023 -

Funding

This project is made possible through the generosity of the Margolis Family Foundation, which provides core resources for the Center, as well as a combination of financial and in-kind contributions from collaborative members including AbbVie; Amgen; Bayer; Boehringer Ingelheim; Eli Lilly and Company; Genentech, a member of the Roche Group; GlaxoSmithKline; Janssen; Merck and Company; Novartis; Pfizer; and Teva Pharmaceuticals.

Participation of private or non-profit organizations in Center activities does not imply an endorsement by Duke University or associated entities. As part of Duke University, Duke-Margolis honors the tradition of academic independence on the part of its faculty and scholars. Neither Duke nor the Margolis Center take partisan positions, but the individual members are free to speak their minds and express their opinions regarding important issues. Duke Margolis adheres to all institutional policies on research independence and conflict of interest.